| 
        
          | TRANSFINITENESS FOR GRAPHS, ELECTRICAL NETWORKS, 
             AND RANDOM WALKSA.H. Zemanian
 |  
          | PREFACE 
 ``What good is a newborn baby?''
 
 Michael Faraday's reputed response when asked,
 
 ``What good is magnetic induction?''
 
 But, it must be admitted that a newborn baby may die in infancy.
 What about this one --- the idea of transfiniteness for
 graphs, electrical networks, and random walks?  At least its bloodline is robust.
 Those subjects, along with Cantor's transfinite numbers,
 comprise its ancestry.
 
 There seems to be general agreement that the theory of graphs was born when
 Leonhard Euler published his solution to the ``Konigsberg bridge problem''
 in 1736.  Similarly, the year of birth for electrical network theory might well
 be taken to be 1847, when Gustav Kirchhoff published his voltage and current laws.
 Ever since those dates until just a few years ago, all infinite undirected graphs
 and networks had an inviolate property:  Two branches either were connected
 through a finite path or were not connected at all.  The idea
 of two branches being connected only through transfinite paths, that is, only through
 paths having infinitely many branches was never invoked, or so
 it appears from a perusal of various surveys of infinite graphs.
 Our objective herein is to explore this idea and some of its ramifications.
 It should be noted however that directed graphs having transfinite
 paths have appeared in set theory, but, by virtue of that directedness
 and the sets the graphs represent, the question of connections at
 infinite extremities of graphs is either avoided or trivially resolved.  This
 question is however a substantial issue in our theory of undirected arbitrary transfinite
 graphs and is resolved by the invention of a new kind of node.
 
 Research on graphs, electrical networks, and random walks
 continues to thrive, and new ideas for them are proliferating.
 It therefore is incumbent upon us to argue why still another may be of
 interest.  One reason is offered in Section 1.4, where it is shown
 that a transfinite network is the natural outcome of an effort to
 close a heretofore unaddressed lacuna in the theory of infinite electrical
 ladders.  A more compelling consideration is that transfiniteness
 introduces radically new constructs and expands the three aforementioned
 topics far beyond their conventional boundaries.  For instance,
 a transfinite graph is not a graph in any prior sense but is instead an
 extension roughly analogous to Cantor's extension of the natural
 numbers to the transfinite ordinals.  It is undoubtedly way too much
 to expect that the introduction of transfinite
 graphs will eventually be as important as Cantor's invention of the
 transfinite numbers.  However, even a small fraction of that success would be ample
 justification for our endeavor.
 
 Transfiniteness for undirected graphs and
 electrical networks was first introduced through some embryonic ideas
 and then in all its generality This book expands upon those
 prior works with a variety of new results.  It is in fact a sequel
 to the book, ``Infinite Electrical Networks'' but can be read independently;
 there is no need to read that book before embarking on this one.  All
 definitions and results within the mainstream of this present book are
 thoroughly developed herein.  Some peripheral ideas that broaden our
 discussions but are not critical to them are borrowed from several sources,
 including ``Infinite Electrical Networks.''  Moreover,
 most of that book was restricted to conventional infinite networks, and
 the lesser part of it on transfinite networks focussed upon the first rank of
 transfiniteness, that is, upon ``1-networks.''  Now,
 however, we exclusively examine transfinite graphs and networks with due
 attention to higher ranks of transfiniteness.  Moreover, we
 expand our theory considerably with the introduction of
 several new topics related to connectedness problems, discrete potential
 theory, uncountable networks, and random walks.
 
 A critical issue in the development of transfinite graphs and
 networks was the choice of appropriate definitions.  Much effort was expended
 in pursuing likely possibilities, many of which failed because of inherent
 contradictions or unmanageable entanglements.  An example of the
 latter is described in Section 1.2.  The definitions we have chosen
 appear to be free of those obstacles and yet sufficiently general
 for our purposes.  To be sure, we could simplify a few
 definitions by weakening them, but this again leads to
 complications because of the variety of situations that then arise.
 We believe that we have arrived at a satisfactory compromise between the
 complexity of definitions and the complexity of subsequent discussions.
 
 On the other hand, we introduce many new concepts.  This is
 due to the unavoidable circumstance that transfinite
 undirected graphs are multifaceted
 structures and entirely novel.  We cannot borrow from established theories
 but instead must construct everything we need.  This is exacerbated by the
 many ranks of transfiniteness, one for each countable ordinal.
 Were we to restrict ourselves to the first rank, that is, to
 ``1-graphs,'' the number of definitions would be comparable to that
 for conventional graphs.  But the extensions to higher ranks through recursion
 expand that number severalfold, especially since
 some of the definitions needed for a limit-ordinal rank are significantly different
 from those for a successor-ordinal rank.
 
 Almost all the ideas about transfinite graphs introduced in
 ``Infinite Electrical Networks'' are employed herein
 without alteration, but there are a few differences.
 One of them concerns the specification of a path,
 which previously involved some ambiguity---with the result that a path
 could be represented in different ways.  The tighter definition we
 now use prevents this.  A related matter is that we now make a distinction
 between a path ``reaching'' a node and ``meeting'' a node, the former concept being weaker
 than the latter.  Still another alteration is that we abandon the idea
 of a ``reduced graph'' and use instead a ``subgraph.''
 A reduced graph is obtained from a given transfinite graph by choosing just
 some of the branches and interconnecting them in accordance with the given
 graph.  It is so defined that a reduced graph is a transfinite graph
 too, but this requires the introduction of other nodes.  A subgraph uses the
 same interconnections of the chosen branches but does not proliferate nodes;
 however, it is in general something other than a transfinite graph.
 This replacement of reduced graphs by subgraphs simplifies our theory.
 
 Our book is arranged as follows.  Chapter 1 is introductory.  After
 explicating notations and terminology in Section 1.1, we argue why
 transfinite graphs and networks should be of interest
 and how they are needed to close a gap in the theory of conventional infinite
 networks. We also indicate why we adopt an unusual approach to conventional
 graphs in order to enable a simpler transfinite generalization.
 
 Transfinite graphs are treated in Chapters 2 through 4, electrical
 networks in Chapters 5 and 6, and random walks in Chapter 7.
 
 Chapter 2 is devoted almost entirely to the many definitions needed for the transfiniteness of graphs.
 Here---and indeed throughout this book---we illustrate new concepts with
 many examples.  Connectedness problems are taken up in Chapter 3.  We show
 that transfinite connectedness need not be transitive as a binary relation
 between branches.  Conditions under which transitivity does hold
 are then obtained.  Chapter 3 closes with a discussion of the
 cardinality of the branch set of a transfinite graph.  In Chapter 4
 we develop the idea of ``finite structuring'' for transfinite
 graphs, which mimics local-finiteness for conventional infinite
 graphs.  This will be needed when we discuss discrete potential theory and
 random walks.  Here we also present a transfinite generalization of
 Konig's classical lemma on the existence of one-way infinite paths.
 
 Chapter 5 presents some fundamental theorems asserting the
 existence and uniqueness of voltage-current regimes in transfinite
 electrical networks under very broad conditions.  No restrictions
 on the transfinite graph of the network are imposed.  These theorems
 are based on a generalization of Tellegen's equation, since
 Kirchhoff's laws are no longer inviolate principles in the
 transfinite case.  Furthermore, node voltages need not be unique nor
 even exist.  The chapter ends by establishing additional conditions
 under which node voltages are uniquely existent.  Maximum principles for
 node voltages and branch currents are established in
 Chapter 6.  This last result makes full use of the finite
 structuring developed in Chapter 4 and therefore holds for a
 class of transfinite networks that is smaller than that for
 the fundamental theorems.
 
 Finally, a theory for random walks on a finitely structured transfinite
 network is established in Chapter 7.  The theory extends nearest-neighbor
 random walks by allowing them to pass through transfinite nodes.
 This is accomplished by exploiting the relationship between
 electrical network theory and random-walk phenomena.
 
 The appendices present brief surveys of three topics of
 importance to our theory, namely ordinal and cardinal numbers,
 summable series, and irreducible and reversible Markov chains.
 With this information our book should be accessible to
 anyone familiar with the basic ideas about graphs, Hilbert spaces,
 and resistive electrical networks.
 
 A.H. Zemanian
 Stony Brook, New York
 |  |